top of page

A walk down old roads

By Joel Pablo Salud

 

It strikes me as odd that I am unable to remember a single day prior to my turning nine years old. Stranger still is the realization that I can only now recall certain episodes, never the entire picture. It’s as if whole images in my brain had been erased. And where the first eight years of my life hummed vaguely like a puff of smoke, only echoes of old roads and houses remain. Long-term memory loss or just plain it’s-too-ancient-to-recall kind of thing? It’s probably because of all the places I had come to love as a child, the streets of Pasay held the most intimate memories for me.

 

Cities are civilization’s crown jewels. They lure the enraptured soul into its sprinkle of glitters the way a full moon woos the sea. It is man’s greatest invention, the one weapon in all of humanity’s years that had protected him from others as well as himself. More than anything, it provided humanity that one excuse to live together peaceably even while he exists for himself—with accompanying civil rights, appreciation for the arts, culture and individual as well as collective achievements, or even just semblances of these. Cities are civilization’s attempt to make individuality work for a collective whole.

 

Along remote and forgotten alleyways lie streets made of cobblestone, lit faintly by dark sky peppered with stars or an old lamppost aglow with candle fire. People often confuse these lovely sites as places for romantic, if not salacious interludes. It is nearly impossible not to remember such cherubic scenes without leaving a whit more inspired.

 

Not all places, though, were as strewn with magic like the ancient cities of Paris or the Greek metropolises. Some are earthy in a philistine kind of way, even menacing, casting an ever suspicious eye on its inhabitants. Pasay’s rough and tumble streets had a macabre sweetness to them the way I remember each one. Although they can hardly stand toe to toe with the cobblestoned walkways of Intramuros or old Binondo at the turn of the twentieth century, they were nevertheless lovely in a dark kind of way. Dominga Street, where I spent my growing up years, speaks of what cities have become through the decades: perennially damp, dingy, almost fugitive in the manner by which it treated its residents. The hollow darkness that seemed to hover over houses was reminiscent of the time when nightfall possessed some measure of ghastly allure, like eerie London of the Ripper’s day.

 

However, one can not exactly call it a chamber of horrors regardless of the brawls one scuttles from if only to live to fight another day. As a teenager learning the ropes, it was the thing to get into—infatuations notwithstanding. The bruises, black eyes, the expected limp, the bloody lip, the busted jawbone—all these served as medals for what, on the other hand, could be quite a lacklustre existence.

 

Yet, Dominga’s cast of characters and quiet symphonies made life in Pasay’s streets worth its weight in memories. The street was flanked by upper middle class and lower middle class homes, with the occasional mansion owned by foreigners standing tall among the rest. I was born in a modest compound of about twelve apartment units my grandfather owned. Our ancestral home stood near the huge metal gate, which opened to an eskenita wide enough for two cars to drive in. In the middle of a fairly small construction yard built for my grandfather’s workers, a huge mango tree towered endlessly into the clouds, or at least that was how I saw it as a child.

 

Mornings came in slow quiet beams of light and familiar voices along this patch of concrete heaven. Here, children smaller than bear cubs dared play tug of war with rampaging jeepneys. I recall the majestic kalesa—the Filipino version of the horse-drawn carriage—plying the streets of Pasay as the first king of Manila’s roads. How small the horses were—no taller than a few inches compared to a Mexican mule. I doubt if they were thoroughbreds. The rapping sound of metal horseshoe on asphalt was probably the thing I remember most about this old road, on top of that reek of horse dung that had all but freed my nostrils from its nightmarish grip. Everyday a lone street sweeper whizzed away the dung with his broom, wishing probably for his life to take a turn for the better. I can barely recall how he looked, but it was the sound of his footsteps—hard and seemingly angry—that had remained with me.

 

Roughly fifty yards from where my family lived was a small intersection flanked by what we would call today as a business center. A sari-sari store owned by an old Chinese businessman was the children’s mainstay recreational center. Before that, a botica stood beside another compound owned by my grandmother’s relatives. Apeng, as the Chinese businessman was fondly called, was a courteous old gentleman of a rather funny bearing and appearance. His nose drooped languidly above his lips, and his hair bore the happy lethargy of pig-tail curls. Soft-spoken and with a ready smile, he would in the mornings greet the children with a treat: small plastic bags filled with champoy, a sweet-sour candy, or some haw flakes. Apeng would be in his usual tattered sleeveless shirt and loose shorts, looking as if he hadn’t had a good bath for weeks. During days when the imp in us wanted nothing more than to make his life miserable, we would steal a piece or two of White Rabbit which he often left unguarded on the glass counter.

 

Across the street, a beauty parlor flaunted its wares for the women of the community. Alongside it, a huge bakery and pastry shop that sold affordable eats for famished street rats like us. I particularly looked forward to certain mornings when the sweet bouquet of freshly baked pan de sal thickly spilled over from the ovens and into the streets, drawing crowds. A peculiar yet personal favourite was a piece of pastry hard enough to knock you over if it accidentally hit you in the head. It had some unnameable pink coloring in the middle and tasted like strawberry. I never outgrew my zest for strawberries, every so often looking for it in milk shakes and wet cakes at the Café Elysee when I got older.

 

Even while mornings in Dominga proved exhilarating enough for us children, afternoons proved even more, say, delectable. After lunch with the family, I would rush back outside for a contest of marbles. Sometime in the middle of the third game, like clockwork, our favourite Chinese vendor would holler, “Taho! Taho!” Without thought to either sanitary or health concerns, we would rush for a treat of soybean curd splashed with sugary syrup. Minutes later, the ice cream man would appear and we would show the same spunk and enthusiasm all over again. The Magnolia brand was the thing to look forward to, although the regular sorbetes brought tingles to my palate like no other cool treat. As the clock rushes to children’s curfew around six in the evening, we would have spent a good ten to fifteen pesos for the various treats Dominga street had offered us.

 

Dominga, to me, was never anything but a safe haven. However, many an elderly in the community had pointed out several “sins” it had fallen into. That is why I can not in the same breath say that it was wrongly accused. Like any other region in the country, we had our share of typhoons, flash floods and our slice of earthquakes. I recall a time when leptospirosis wasn’t a thing to be feared and floods were good enough reasons to play in the open streets. If luck would have it, a child would get to bring home some dalag or gurami during waist-high floods to house in a makeshift aquarium.  

 

The older folks weren’t referring to that, however. As a teenager I was beginning to be aware of the distribution of illegal drugs in the area. Naïve as any at the time, I hardly thought it would rise to such a disturbing, if not debilitating, extent. Home invasions increased, and brawls among addicts and street gangs came close to making the headlines.

 

Somehow my family had gone past the hour of patience, forcing my elders to the decision that it was time to go. We left Dominga and our ancestral house in the care of those who stayed behind. Saying goodbye to friends was perhaps the hardest I had ever experienced as a child. Sobbing as I entered the old yellow-orange Mustang, my mother said, “You will get to meet other friends where we are going.” I’m now forty-eight, a writer and journalist and cursed with the social life of a cockroach. The only real friends I have now outside of loved ones and family are my cats. By some odd twist of fate, only memories of childhood friends remained.

 

Where’s the politics in this essay? Nowhere, except within the isolation that had kept my eye trained to look at people and events from a writer’s point of view. Detachment, little did I know then, was going to be the bedrock of my profession. Observation, a keen eye for details, noticing every sleight of tongue and hand led the way to understanding much of the nuances in daily happenings. Context, more than sheer objectivity, comes into play, thanks to years of watching people—the unnoticeable twitch of the eyes, the quick curve of the lips, tapping of fingers on the wooden table, the uneasy squirm, the unnecessary word or conscious phrasing of words, and of course, knowing the bigger picture—all telling me if the interviewee was either lying or telling the truth. Here, real learning came from watching human nature either makes a fool of itself or braves the ire of observers for the simple love of truth.

 

There is nothing good or bad in being humanity’s audience because you get to learn more about yourself than anyone else.

 

2 March 2012

Pasong Tamo

Makati City

It's fiction. Live with it.

By Joel Pablo Salud

First published in the Philippines Graphic magazine

 

The truth about fiction is that it’s a lie. Exclamation point.

 

And if this hasn’t sunk like a knife in the throat after years of reading novels, then perhaps a shift to Dan Brown’s books is called for, which had somehow taken the form of truth rather than the product of a writer's imagination.

 

Recently, the controversial author of The Da Vinci Code has done it again, or so reports say. Dan Brown recently launched his latest novel, Inferno, with all the fanfare expected of an author dying to make a sale: uproot a perfectly fine day by calling Manila “the gates of hell”. The intention seems to be clear: To make a riotous killing in the literary box-office (enough to shame the Maguindanao Massacre) by way of controversy. And it worked. The book on its first few days hit the British paperback pop charts with a little over 200,000 in sales.

 

Brown’s gig with controversy is hardly original. The author has figured in a squabble with the Catholic Church during the launching of The Da Vinci Code, which was later turned into critically-acclaimed film made by Ron Howard and Akiva Goldsman. The craziest thing: Even the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines issued a warning against the book. His first three novels found little success until The Da Vinci Code was published in 2003. It had sold roughly 80 million copies since then.

 

Controversy, it seems, has hounded the author like a chimp on his back. After its successful launch, he was slammed twice with a copyright infringement cases. Both floundered as there were no bases for their plagiarism charges.

 

When news of Manila being the “gates of hell” hit the online community of Filipinos, a number hardly took it in stride. Many feared that the portrayal, erroneous at best, would only add to the long list of negative impressions the country has suffered under for years. Others took it rather personally, saying that the author should visit the Philippines in order to have an accurate description of places in his writings. His own writing style has been criticized on occasions, saying that it’s “clumsy”.

 

I’m not about to spend this page convincing everyone not to buy or read Dan Brown’s books. In fact, I’d say we all go buy ourselves a copy and see if Brown’s rendering of Manila falls right into the pothole despite his attempts at fiction. Fact is again, we don’t really need to go ballistic every time we hear or read someone lambast our beloved city. More so if it’s fiction.

 

The thing about fiction is this: There is never enough truth in it to make it fact. Or maybe it’s the other way around. There is never enough fact in fiction to make it absolutely, indubitably true. Jose “Butch” Dalisay was spot on when he said in an interview with Philippine Star that truth and fact are two different things. Either way, fiction remains a lie—like brandy with ice. If for any reason one treats fiction as non-fiction, then that one ought to be on drugs or else the latter would be the least of your problems.

 

So then, why even bother spewing venom on anyone who attacks or derides Manila in a fictional story? I mean, let’s all try to get a grip: Dan Brown got it wrong when he allegedly wrote Manila as the “gates of hell”. Why simply gates? Why not hell itself, the home of fire and brimstone, lake of fire, stupendous amount of street food?

 

No, we don’t have six-hour traffic jams, but we do have six-kilometre vehicular congestions. Compared to the People’s Republic of China, our supposed “suffocating pollution” is literally a breath of fresh air. What is nauseating in Manila is another kind of polluting agent—smokescreens used to cover political corruption in government. What makes the sex trade horrifying in this part of the underground economy is that our women are forced to seek it out on account of unrelenting poverty. And Manila’s just the tip of the problem. In the provinces, a one-night stand costs a little over the value of a happy meal. A liver, a kidney, an eye may cost more.

 

The Philippines has roughly 100 million people moving around in circles, with a Metro Manila population of a little over 12 million based on data culled by the National Statistics Office. Half the overall number is the youth. An estimated 12,000 are Metro Manila’s street children. Double the number, do the math, and you get the estimated figure of the country’s homeless families. About two million of 100 million are unemployed. Underemployed, on the other hand, are a little over seven million. Six million are out of the country as overseas Filipino workers. Some are now being beaten to an inch of their lives in Taiwan.

 

You see, Mr. Brown, your homeland, the United States, is never far from the Philippines’ hellish gates. The U.S. hit rock bottom when unemployment reached a staggering 7.6%, larger by a mile from what the Philippines had had. Some experts say unemployment in the good US of A is in fact 11.3%, with little hope of recovering for now. You suffer the worst of disasters, one of which was the election of George W. Your country has ten of the poorest cities because, as told by the Free Republic, some have not elected a mayor since the turn of the 20th-century. The only thing going for you is that in the Philippines, we are poor, and quite relatively so, all because we elected someone in office—including his relatives.

 

As for the flesh trade, “horrifying” hardly comes close to real-time statistics. According to reports, an estimated 800,000 women—100,000 children—are involved in prostitution in the Philippines. Quite the conservative figure if you go by what experts actually believe: It’s almost double the number if you include men, some senior citizens and online webcam “eye candies”. If at all there’s a real horror story behind this, it is this: Many of the children are sold like Tootsie Rolls in the market by their own parents. Forget about tax exemptions: They carry no receipts. Some are barely out of the crib to even walk, let alone pleasure a 200-pound Caucasian with a fetish for pain. Nearly all of these children serve up to 15 clients in a day. And for what: P100 for a four-hour ride into paedophilic bliss? Horrifying? You have no effing idea, Mr. Brown.

 

In a country where corruption is such that even those into the flesh trade and hardcore felons sneer at thieves in government, it’s mind boggling to know that what goes into the pockets of corrupt officials equals 10% of the country’s gross national product. And many of these politicians would’ve been better off as fiction writers. They lie through their teeth with such gripping creativity, one could’ve sworn they were masters of fiction writing.

 

I cannot stress it enough: Dan Brown’s Inferno is a work of fiction, and not that it's the best on the shelves. Besides, his description only pointed out “six hour traffic jams, suffocating pollution, horrifying sex trade.” Hey, sounds like the ramshackle kitchen of my next door neighbour. He left out brownouts for days, shabu tiangge, gang rapes, unrelenting poverty, petty politics in private and public offices, dynastic families running for office and election fraud, plagiarism in the courts and poor excuses for government leaders.

 

Not only that, without such a riveting display of Manila's gothic charm, his novel may not have overrun the British charts. I’m only too glad we helped. What other thing can we expect from someone born in a place where Hepatitis-C outbreaks happen in their hospitals. Don't fall for his marketing spiel. The man loves controversy and there’s nothing wrong with that. Make a sale, pay the bills. And if you have ever written a novel yourself, you’d know where I am coming from. Salman Rushdie had his Satanic Verses, Vladimir Nobokov his Lolita, Jose Rizal his Noli Me Tangere—and how much of the latter was really meant for nationalistic propaganda.

 

Let Brown indulge in a bit of fiction; it’s the writer's thing. Let’s buy a copy if the chance calls for it. But then again, there are Filipino authors and their books are way, way better. 

bottom of page